Skip to Content
Math4302Modern Algebra (Lecture 22)

Math4302 Modern Algebra (Lecture 22)

Groups

Group acting on a set

Let XX be a GG-set, recall that the orbit of x∈Xx\in X is {g⋅x∣g∈G}\{g\cdot x|g\in G\}.

The orbit-stabilizer theorem

For any x∈Xx\in X, ,Gx={g∈G∣g⋅x=x}≤GG_x=\{g\in G|g\cdot x=x\}\leq G.

Let (G:Gx)(G:G_x) denote the index of GxG_x in GG, then (G:Gx)=∣G∣∣Gx∣(G:G_x)=\frac{|G|}{|G_x|}, which equals to the number of left cosets of GxG_x in GG.

Proof

Define α:gGx↦g⋅x\alpha:gG_x\mapsto g\cdot x.

α\alpha is well-defined and injective.

gGx=g′Gx  ⟺  g−1g′∈Gx  ⟺  (g−1g′)⋅x=x  ⟺  g−1⋅(g′⋅x)=x  ⟺  g′⋅x=g⋅xgG_x=g'G_x\iff g^{-1}g'\in G_x\iff (g^{-1}g')\cdot x=x\iff g^{-1}\cdot(g'\cdot x)=x\iff g'\cdot x=g\cdot x

α\alpha is surjective, therefore α\alpha is a bijection.

Example

Number of elements in the orbit of xx is 11 if and only if g⋅x=xg\cdot x=x for all g∈Gg\in G.

if and only if Gx=GG_x=G.

Theorem for orbit with prime power groups

Suppose XX is a GG-set, and ∣G∣=pn|G|=p^n for some prime pp. Let XGX_G be the set of all elements in XX whose orbit has size 11. (Recall the orbit divides XX into disjoint partitions.) Then ∣X∣≡∣XG∣mod  p|X|\equiv |X_G|\mod p.

Examples

Let G=D4G=D_4 acting on {1,2,3,4}=X\{1,2,3,4\}=X.

XG=∅X_G=\emptyset since there is no element whose orbit has size 11.


Let G=Z11G=\mathbb{Z}_{11} acting on a set with ∣X∣=20|X|=20 if the action is not trivial, then what is ∣XG∣|X_G|?

Using the theorem we have ∣XG∣≡20mod  11=9|X_G|\equiv 20\mod 11=9. Therefore ∣XG∣=9|X_G|=9 or 2020, but the action is not trivial, ∣XG∣=9|X_G|=9.

An instance for such X=Z11⊔{x1,x2,…,x9}X=\mathbb{Z}_{11}\sqcup\{x_1,x_2,\ldots,x_9\}, where Z11\mathbb{Z}_{11} acts on {x1,x2,…,x9}\{x_1,x_2,\ldots,x_9\} trivially. and Z11\mathbb{Z}_{11} acts on x1x_1 with addition.

Proof

If x∈Xx\in X such that ∣Gx∣≥2|Gx|\geq 2, then ∣G∣∣Gx∣=∣Gx∣≥2\frac{|G|}{|G_x|}=|Gx|\geq 2.

So ∣G∣=∣Gx∣∣Gx∣  ⟹  ∣Gx∣|G|=|G_x||Gx|\implies |Gx| divides ∣G∣|G|.

So ∣Gx∣=pm|Gx|=p^m for some m≥1m\geq 1.

Note that XX is the union of subset of elements with orbit of size 11, and distinct orbits of sizes ≥2\geq 2. (each of them has size positive power of pp)

So p∣(∣X∣−∣XG∣)p|(|X|-|X_G|).

this implies that ∣XG∣≡∣XG∣mod  p|X_G|\equiv |X_G|\mod p.

Corollary: Cauchy’s theorem

If pp is prime and p∣(∣G∣)p|(|G|), then GG has a subgroup of order pp.

This does not hold when pp is not prime.

Consider A4A_4 with order 1212, and A4A_4 has no subgroup of order 66.

Proof

It is enough to show, there is a∈Ga\in G which has order pp: {e,a,a2,…,ap−1}≤G\{e,a,a^2,\ldots,a^{p-1}\}\leq G.

Let X={(g1,g2,…,gp)∣gi∈G,g1g2g3…gp=e}X=\{(g_1,g_2,\ldots,g_p)|g_i\in G,g_1g_2g_3\ldots g_p=e\}.

Then ∣X∣=∣G∣p−1|X|=|G|^{p-1} since gpg_p is determined uniquely by gp=(g1,g2,…,gp−1)−1g_p=(g_1,g_2,\ldots,g_{p-1})^{-1}.

Therefore we can define Zp\mathbb{Z}_p acts on XX by shifting.

i∈Zpi\in \mathbb{Z}_p i⋅(g1,g2,…,gp)=(gi+1,g2,…,gp,g1,…,gi)i\cdot (g_1,g_2,\ldots,g_p)=(g_{i+1},g_2,\ldots,g_p,g_1,\ldots,g_i).

XX is a Zp\mathbb{Z}_p-set.

  • 0⋅(g1,g2,…,gp)=(g1,g2,…,gp)0\cdot (g_1,g_2,\ldots,g_p)=(g_1,g_2,\ldots,g_p).
  • j⋅(i⋅(g1,g2,…,gp))=(i+j)⋅(g1,g2,…,gp)j\cdot (i\cdot (g_1,g_2,\ldots,g_p))=(i+j)\cdot (g_1,g_2,\ldots,g_p).

By the previous theorem, ∣X∣≡∣XG∣mod  p|X|\equiv |X_G|\mod p.

Since pp divides ∣G∣p−1|G|^{p-1}, pp also divides ∣XG∣|X_G|. Therefore (e,e,e,…,e)∈XG(e,e,e,\ldots,e)\in X_G. Therefore ∣XG∣≥1|X_G|\geq 1.

So ∣XG∣≥2|X_G|\geq 2, we have (a,a,…,a)∈XG(a,a,\ldots,a)\in X_G, a≠ea\neq e, but ap=ea^p=e, so ord(a)=pord(a)=p.

Last updated on