Skip to Content
Math4302Modern Algebra (Lecture 34)

Math4302 Modern Algebra (Lecture 34)

Rings

Maximal Ideals

Assume that RR is a commutative ring with unity.

MRM\subsetneq Ris maximal if MIRM\subseteq I\subseteq R for ideal II in RR implies I=MI=M or I=RI=R.

Theorem for Maximal Ideals induces a Field

IRI\subsetneq R is an ideal, and R/IR/I is a field if and only if II is a maximal ideal.

Proof

    \impliedby: Proved last time.

    \implies: If IJRI\subsetneq J\subseteq R, where JJ is an ideal.

Then we pick aJa\in J, aIa\notin I. We have a+IIa+I\neq I.

So a+Ia+I is non-zero element in R/IR/I, so it has a multiplicative inverse b+Ib+I: (a+I)(b+I)=1+I(a+I)(b+I)=1+I.

So ab+I=1+Iab+I=1+I, so ab1IJab-1\in I\subset J, so 1=abiJ1=ab-i\in J, since aJa\in J, and iJi\in J.

So J=RJ=R.

Recall if FF is a field, every ideal in F[x]F[x] is principal (can be generated by some (f(x))(f(x))), and if I=(f(x))={f(x)g(x)g(x)F[x]}I=(f(x))=\{f(x)g(x)|g(x)\in F[x]\}, then II is maximal if and only if f(x)f(x) is irreducible.

Definition of Prime Ideals

Let RR be a commutative ring with unity. An ideal IRI\subsetneq R is called prime if abIab\in I implies aIa\in I or bIb\in I.

Example

nZn\mathbb{Z} is a prime ideal if and only if nn is prime.

nZn\mathbb{Z} prime when nabn|ab implies nan|a or nbn|b.

Theorem for Prime Ideals induces Integral Domain

IRI\subset R is an ideal R/IR/I is an integral domain if and only if II is a prime ideal.

Proof

(a+I)(b+I)=0+I(a+I)(b+I)=0+I if and only if a+I=Ia+I=I or b+I=Ib+I=I.

    \implies: If abIab\in I, then ab+I=0+Iab+I=0+I, so (a+I)(b+I)=I(a+I)(b+I)=I, which is the zero element in R/IR/I.

Since R/IR/I is an integral domain, (a+I)(b+I)=0+I(a+I)(b+I)=0+I implies a+I=Ia+I=I or b+I=Ib+I=I.

    \impliedby: If (a+I)(b+I)=0+I(a+I)(b+I)=0+I, then abIab\in I, so a\inIa\i nI or bIb\in I (by definition of ideal), so a+I=Ia+I=I or b+I=Ib+I=I.

Corollary: Maximal Ideals are Prime Ideals

Every maximal ideal is a prime ideal.

Proof

Field is an integral domain, so every maximal ideal is a prime ideal.

But not the that the converse is false.

Example of prime ideal that is not maximal

In Z[x]\mathbb{Z}[x], we saw M={f(x)constant term is even}M=\{f(x)\mid \text{constant term is even}\} is an ideal.

Let I={f(x)constant term is 0}I=\{f(x)\mid \text{constant term is 0}\}.

Note that IMI\subsetneq M (Therefore II is not maximal), and II is an ideal.

And note that II is also a prime ideal (if any of the coefficients is 0, then the constant term is 0).

In general, prime ideal is a weaker condition than maximal ideal.

Field extensions

We got this in linear codes! 

Use a field to create a new field.

Let FEF\subset E and F,EF,E are also fields.

Theorem for zero in field extension

Suppose FF is a field and f(x)F[x]f(x)\in F[x] is a polynomial with degree 1\geq 1. There is a field extension EE of FF such that f(x)f(x) has a zero in EE.

Proof

We can assume that f(x)f(x) is irreducible. (we can write all the polynomial in F[x]F[x] as product of irreducible polynomials.)

Consider the ideal generated by f(x)f(x).

Since f(x)f(x) is irreducible, II is a maximal ideal in F[x]F[x].

We have F[x]/IF[x]/I is a field.

This is a field contain FF. We have an inclusion map FF[x]/IF\subset F[x]/I. aa+Ia\mapsto a+I.

Think of f(x)f(x) as a polynomial with coefficients in E(x)E(x) and evaluate it at x+Ix+I.

If f(x)=anxn+an1xn1++a1x+a0f(x)=a_nx^n+a_{n-1}x^{n-1}+\cdots+a_1x+a_0, then

\begin{aligned} f(x+I)&=(a_n+I)(x+I)^n+(a_{n-1}+I)(x+I)^{n-1}+\cdots+(a_1+I)(x+I)+(a_0+I)\\ &=(a_nx^n+I)+(a_{n-1}x^{n-1}+I)+\cdots+(a_1x+I)+(a_0+I)\\ &=(a_nx^n+a_{n-1}x^{n-1}+\cdots+a_1x+a_0)+I\\ &=f(x)+I\\ &=I \end{aligned} $$. Where $I$ is the zero element in $F[x]/I$. </details> <details> <summary>Example</summary> $f(x)=x^2+1\in \mathbb{R}[x]$ has no zero in $\mathbb{R}$. Let $I=(x^2+1)\subset \mathbb{R}[x]$. $I$ is maximal ideal in $\mathbb{R}[x]$, and consider $\mathbb{R}[x]/I$. $R\to \mathbb{R}[x]/I$. $r\mapsto r+I$. So that $x+I$ is a zero of $x^2+1\in E[x]$. --- We claim that $E\simeq \mathbb{C}$. The isomorphism is given by $\mathbb C\overset{\phi}{\to}\mathbb R/(x^2+1)$, $a+bi\mapsto (a+bx)+I$ $\phi((a+bi)+(a'+bi'))=(a+bx)+(a'+b'x)+I==\phi(a+bi)+\phi(a'+bi')$ $\phi((a+bi)\cdot (a'+bi'))=(a+bx)(a'+bx)+I=(a^2+b^2)+I=\phi(a+bi)+\phi(a'+bi')$ </details>
Last updated on